Monday, April 25, 2005

Justified?

Example

The St. Petersburg Times reported on an incident where police put an out of control, five year old girl in handcuffs. Was it justified? Let’s go to the video-tape...

OK...maybe this tape doesn't show the whole story. But the sight of a child being put in handcuffs does strike and emotional cord. I don't know that this was the right course of action at the time. But not shown on this tape is the following behavior:

She tore papers off Dibenedetto's bulletin board and desk. She climbed on a table four times. About an hour had passed since she refused to participate in a kindergarten math lesson, which escalated into a series of defiant and destructive acts.

The tape, which lasts about 30 minutes, begins with Dibenedetto alone in the classroom with the girl, saying the child's name frequently as part of her commands.


"You need to stop," she tells her, using her hands to make the sign language signal for stop. "You don't get to wreck the room."

Using her radio, she calls for help from teacher Patti Tsaousis. She also asks the school office to call the girl's mother and tell her the school will have to call Pinellas Schools police if the behavior continues.

Word comes back that the mother would not be able to make it until 3:15 p.m. It is shortly after 2 p.m.

A short time later, the girl is heard off camera breaking a ceramic or plastic apple on Ottersbach's desk.

"Oh, you broke her apple," Dibenedetto says. "That is so sad."

Throughout the 23-minute segment in the classroom, the assistant principal tells the girl many times to stop, that her actions are "not acceptable." She tells her she needs to take her to her office to prepare for her mother's arrival.

The girl responds to each request with a curt, "No." When the girl reaches out to strike them at times, Dibenedetto and Tsaousis tell her to stop and hold their hands up in defense.

Incidents like this are playing themselves out in classrooms across the country. Although, very few probably end with a child in handcuffs, you would be surprised by the epidemic of out of control school children defying and attacking adults. Yes, the balance of power has shifted in schools. And most teachers, as well as administrators are powerless to take back their rightful place as authority figures in the schools.

When I was in school, it was a given that the teacher was the authority figure in the classroom. This basic assumption is no longer the case. As a former public school teacher I have seen students defy, curse at and in some cases even attack teachers and administrators. Where do you think these children are getting the idea that it is ok to physically attack adults? At home!

Discipline and respect for authority is primarily taught in the home. This is where a child learns that there are consequences for their choices; good and bad. They also learn that there are boundaries and limits to their behavior. They also learn the concept of respect for authority at home.

When I was growing up, I never thought of calling adults by their first name. My parents always taught me that to do so was to put myself on their level. And that until I was grown (supporting myself and paying my own way), I was not on their level. Yet today, I cannot tell you the number of times I have had an adult introduce me to their children as “Craig”. Such a minor interaction may seem insignificant. But it is just one of the many ways that we undermine the concept of authority in our society.

We have bred a lack of respect for authority. Television, rap music and violent video games have shouldered the brunt of the blame, but who is letting these youngsters partake of this trash? Pop culture is not the only culprit. We as parents are partially to blame! We have given into the mentality that we should be friends with our children.

Let’s be real! Our children do not need more friends. They need parents! They need parents who love them enough to discipline them; to teach them self-control and respect for authority. They must learn that every choice they make has consequences; good and bad.

If we, who claim love our children, do not teach them these lessons; they will be forced to learn them from a system that does not love them; the criminal justice system. And I do not relish the thought of my child in handcuffs. Do you?

(Click Pic For More)

Also of interest: A commentary I wrote a few months ago "Train Up a Child" further discusses our role as parents.

Craig DeLuz

Visit The Home of Uncommon Sense…
www.craigdeluz.com

Thursday, April 21, 2005

ABC's Nightline- "Blaming the Bench"

ABC's Nightline- "Blaming the Bench" (4/21/05)

"He's making decisions for me that are supposed to represent the values of the voters of Sacramento County, and he's not," said Craig Deluz of the Judge Recall Committee. "And so, my main focus is on making sure we get him out of office."

(Click Here for More)

McMaster Recall Gets National Attention- Watch Nightline Tonight

Example

**TONIGHT** (Thursday April 21st) I will be on ABC's Nightline representing the Recall of Judge Loren McMaster. This is the Judge who said it was ok to create counterfeit marriage.

This recall effort has been getting a lot of attention nationwide. And will likely get a lot more as the people wake up to the reality that we must deal with an out of control judiciary.

Starting next week I will be publishing a series of blogs on why we should recall Judge McMaster and the importance of putting the judiciary back in it’s place.

So stay tuned!!!

(Click pic for More)

Craig DeLuz

Visit The Home of Uncommon Sense…
www.craigdeluz.com

Tuesday, April 19, 2005

State NAACP doesn't speak for all blacks, pastors say at Capitol event

Craig DeLuz, an organizer of Monday's news conference by black clergy and congregants, vowed opponents of AB 19 will not relent.

"We want members of the Legislature and of the NAACP to know you will not be able to enact these laws without us watching," DeLuz said.

(Click Here for More)


Black Pastors Unite!

About 50-60 African American pastors and their congregants gathered outside the State Capitol Building to protest the Democrat's attempt to legalize same sex marriage. And to let the California NAACP know that they do not speak for all Blacks.

The Sacramento Bee quotes:

"We understand marriage very well - she's the one that's confused if she thinks homosexual marriage is OK," said Brenda Bennett, president of the Sacramento Alliance for Civil Rights.

The Rev. Alfred Walker, a pastor at Calvary Christian Center in Sacramento, said the proposed bill conflicts with Proposition 22. Overwhelmingly approved by voters in 2000, the initiative restricts marriage in California to a man and a woman.

"The people in California have clearly indicated what their preference is concerning this issue," Walker said. "It should not be an issue that judges, legislators and other people try to override."

Unfortunately, the Bee, as did much of the media in attendance seemed make every attempt to downplay the success of the event. They report only about “two dozen” in attendance.

Well thank God there were much more!

Click Here for the Real Story on the event and to find out how you can support the Sacramento Alliance for Civil Rights!

(Click Pic For More)

Craig DeLuz

Visit The Home of Uncommon Sense…
www.craigdeluz.com

Friday, April 15, 2005

Support Paycheck Protection

Support Paycheck Protection (4/15/05)

Thomas Jefferson once wrote that "to compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves is sinful and tyrannical."

Well this very practice is alive and well today. Labor unions throughout the country have a standard practice of taking money from their members and, without their permission, utilizing it to promote their own political agenda.

(Click Here for More)




This is about Parents' Rights

Example

The Parental notification Initiative looks to be on it’s way to qualifying for the next statewide ballot. The media and pro-abortion activists are doing everything possible to make this issue about abortion. But isn’t it really about a parent’s right to raise their children?

The San Francisco Chronicle article entitled “Abortion initiative shifts vote climate:Special election would no longer belong to governor”, starts off:

A fight over the ever-divisive abortion issue threatens to pull the spotlight from Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's plan to put measures to change state government on a special election ballot in November.

Why do liberals persist in attacking this matter as an abortion issue? Because they know when it is couched as a matter of Parental Rights, they lose. Even liberal politicians cannot justify usurping parents’ rights by allowing abortions on their children without their knowledge.

Last January, for example, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., told a crowd at a rally marking the 32nd anniversary of the Roe vs. Wade Supreme Court decision, which legalized abortion, that she supported a parental notification law that would include exceptions for teenagers estranged from their families.

A few days later, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who touted his pro-choice credentials during the 2004 presidential campaign, told NBC's "Meet the Press" that "I am for parental notification.''

Does this mean that Hillary Clinton and John Kerry support parents’ rights? Not necessarily. More likely, it means that they can read polls.

A May 2002 Field Poll showed that while 63 percent of the state's registered voters supported abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy, a nearly identical 62 percent backed a strict law that would require teenagers younger than 18 to get their parents' consent before obtaining an abortion.

With such overwhelming support for parental consent, it should be no problems passing parental notification. But it won’t be approved without a fight.

Groups such as Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union have vowed to fight the measure if it makes the ballot.

The initiative is political overkill, said Justine Sarver, vice president of Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California…


With the abortion industry on the unpopular side of this issue, it will be interesting to see the angle they take in opposing this initiative. I can see their slogan now:

Give us your babies, so that we can kill their babies!

(Click Pic For More)

Craig DeLuz

Visit The Home of Uncommon Sense…
www.craigdeluz.com